Abstract
This paper provides an economical study on the rationality of confidential obligation of attorney and prescription of prosecution. Through behavior analysis centered on cost-income for the parties involved, this paper discovers the confidential obligation of attorney and prescription of prosecution can not realize the maxim of judicial proceeds in a low level of private cost and social cost outcome, which is to say, these two rules result in the low efficiency of the judicial resource allocation.
Translated title of the contribution | Economic Analysis of Confidential Obligation of Attorney and Prescription of Prosecution |
---|---|
Original language | Chinese (Simplified) |
Pages (from-to) | 8-40 |
Journal | 海派经济学 |
Issue number | 1 |
Publication status | Published - 2004 |
Keywords
- Fair
- Efficiency
- Confidential Obligation of Attorney
- Prescription of Prosecution