回到斯密,还是要回到马克思?

Translated title of the contribution: Return to Adam Smith,or to Return to Marx?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Both Yifu Lin and Weiying Zhang advocate returning to Smith. Weiying Zhang insist the opinions of Adam Smith' s liberalization,marketization, privatization, but put side historical limitations of Smith' s ideas .This is what we are firmly against. Yifu Lin favorite is the method of Smith's An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations,but he don't understand that the method is duality, conflict, non-historical,and that the method is not suitable for the actual situation of contemporary China. Now, we must be going back to Marx’s standpoint, viewpoint and method, which is the only guiding ideology. Marx' s standpoint, viewpoint and method can guide the construction of the socialist market economy in contemporary China, and explain local phenomena in the development of market economy.
Translated title of the contributionReturn to Adam Smith,or to Return to Marx?
Original languageChinese (Simplified)
Pages (from-to)11-21
Number of pages11
Journal海派经济学
Volume15
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Contemporary China
  • Guiding Ideology
  • Return to Marx

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Return to Adam Smith,or to Return to Marx?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this